Vortex formation time: an emerging echocardiographic index of left ventricular filling efficiency?

About 500 years ago, Leonardo da Vinci conducted a haemodynamic study of the sinus of Valsalva in which he deduced and explained formation of a blood flow vortex. Fast forwarding to the present, Gharib et al. used an experimental arrangement of a piston producing a wide range of jets and vortex rings alongside those jets by pushing columns of fluid of length L through an orifice with diameter D. They referred to the length-to-diameter ratio, i.e. L/D, as the formation number. While settings with low L/D generated merely a single and rather weak vortex ring, settings with large L/D resulted in a vortex ring that could no longer grow and was followed by a less-efficient fluid transport by a trailing jet. The maximum growth of the vortex ring without a trailing jet was observed when the L/D ratio was within a limited value range of 3.6–4.6 for an otherwise wide variety of flow conditions. Because L can be expressed in terms of the mean piston velocity ( U) and duration of the piston stroke (t) as L = U × t, then the formation number can be defined as L/D = U × t/D. The right side of the equation, which incorporates time information, makes it clear why this dimensionless index is also referred to as vortex formation time (VFT). Poh et al. report VFT values for normal subjects as well as heart failure (HF) patients with and without preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF). On the basis of exclusion criteria, only data from subjects without significant primary valvular disease were used in the study, which is important because mitral pathology would impair correlation between valve kinematics and vortex-limiting formation time. The results of the current study indicate that VFT could be a predictor of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with HF. As the authors state, VFT is a composite index and prognostic significance of its component parameters has previously been demonstrated. However, the ‘whole’, i.e. VFT as the composite index, may be in some respect better than the combination of its component parts: experimental evidence suggests that the narrow range of optimal VFT values may represent a universal time scale for efficient vortex ring formation. Moreover, a diastolic vortex ring appears to function as a temporary kinetic energy reservoir that supports blood redirection into the outflow tract during the preejection phase and generates a force that initiates timely closure of the mitral valve. One could then speculate that, for example, formation of a diastolic vortex (or lack thereof) is an intraventricular fluid dynamics factor associated with improvement (or no improvement) of LV function or clinical status after cardiac resynchronization therapy. In this context, an experimental study by Sengupta et al. documents that conversion from a sinus rhythm to LV epicardial or right atrial pacing results in loss of a well-organized vortex and occurrence of blood turbulence during the preejection period. A different experimental study, in which measurement of D reflected early diastolic filling, demonstrates that acute elevation of LV afterload leads to a significant drop of the mean VFT value below the optimal range. Figure 1 is based on echocardiographic particle image velocimetry 14 applied to contrast clips collected in this experimental study at baseline and during moderate LV afterload. The emerging echocardiographic imaging method complements the VFT parametric analysis by making loss of a vortex ring visually evident and providing local flow velocity vectors. The current study by Poh et al. also demonstrates that VFT can separate control subjects from HF patients with preserved EF and HF patients with preserved EF from those with reduced EF. These findings are expectable because the component parts of the VFT index incorporate both systolic and diastolic functional indicators. Surprisingly, however, in all three subject groups, the mean VFT values were well below the normal range otherwise predicted by others in bench tests and confirmed by in vivo experiments and clinical studies. Values of VFT below the optimal range do not preclude formation of a vortex. Still, why would not at least normal control subjects have the value within the optimal VFT range? One explanation, which has also been offered by Poh et al., is in using the diameter of the mitral annulus as a surrogate of the exit diameter of the mitral valve orifice in a beating heart.